Debunking the myths first

Okay, so some of the mantras which have been formulated around greener living, in all areas of our lives and not just in business, are not myths and all and are true. However, many of these are taken out of context or they’re applied in all contexts, some of which contexts render them completely useless or having the exact opposite effect of what was intended of them.

For example, we’ve preached the gospel of going paperless perhaps always making for a better option as far as something like communication. It’s better for the environment to send an email than to have a tree chopped down so that you can send a snail mail letter, is it not?

Not necessarily…

When considering the environmental impact of email servers and IT infrastructure compared to traditional mail, it becomes evident that the former has a greater environmental footprint. However, this doesn’t mean we should revert to paper-based communication.

Instead, we should adopt a different perspective on environmental friendliness, focusing on achieving a net positive effect rather than simply opting for seemingly greener options. For instance, let’s consider the case of mining. While mining operations can harm local ecosystems, completely halting mining activities would hinder human progress, as we rely on Earth’s resources.

In such cases, mining companies can take responsible measures, such as hydroseeding or hydro mulching the area once mining operations cease. This process helps restore the ecosystem of the affected area while also allowing us to obtain the necessary minerals we require. (to know more about hydroseeding vs hydromulching processes, visit here)

That said, in order to achieve overall environmental friendliness, there are three key areas that warrant our attention:

1. The value of businesses sticking to their natural size

It happens more in the realms of those businesses which harbour ambitions of infinite growth and expansion, such as those which go on to list on the stock exchange, where it’s profits first and everything else afterwards. This is bad for the environment in that resources are consumed relentlessly in pursuit of growth prospects, some of which never even fully materialise. These types of businesses are of the idea that they can throw money at the problems later on, once they have piles and piles of it, whereas it’s better for every business to be satisfied with its natural size.

Fat chance of that happening, because greed has become synonymous with the profits thought to be only obtainable through endless growth and expansion.

2. The effect of maintaining environment-friendly business premises

Maintaining environment-friendly business premises goes beyond reducing a company’s carbon footprint; it can also have a profound impact on the overall aesthetics and well-being of the workplace. The presence of green spaces and trees in and around the premises not only improves air quality but also creates a more pleasant and productive working environment.

Employees often find solace in natural surroundings, and clients are more likely to be impressed by a company that cares for the environment. Furthermore, to ensure the greens and the trees on your premises are always presentable, it’s essential to collaborate with experts who can be found by searching “tree surgeons near me“, or something to that effect. Such services can provide expert care and maintenance, further reinforcing the commitment to eco-friendly practices and a positive work atmosphere.

3. The relationship between specialisation and environmental-friendliness

This builds on from the previous section of businesses sticking to their natural size, with a bit more of a practical application. If everybody knows to source a certain selection of products from a certain specialist supplier, such as how Grasscity United Kingdom has it all by way of smoking accessories, there is less of a burden on the resources which are used to create the business channels around that vendor. We don’t need one million logistics companies delivering what is essentially the same product from different suppliers if only one supplier has the full complement of those products in the range they offer, for instance.

4. The consumer’s responsibility

Lastly, customers should jump on board too and question the business practices of the vendors whose businesses they patronise. If you’re serious about going greener then you need to speak through your buying decisions.